Customer feedback

Comments: I have been looking for a shoe for years that will give me the support my feet need!!!! I have finally found them with this shoe. I was so impressed. I have already purchased 6 pairs

From: Peacho, Seattle, WA, USA. July 29th 2014

Comments: Comfortable. I am able to run forever in these. I have flat feet and weigh 230 so I need well cushioned shoes and these are perfect. I do not find them narrow at all. I wear a 13 in all other brands Nike Asics and these fit in a 13 too. I wish all Brooks would be true to size so I could switch over 100 percent to Brooks. In some other Brooks I need to half size up but can not because there are no 13.5s. So if Brooks keeps making shoes similar sized to Asics and Nike I would be a permanent customer.
From: will, Harbor Springs, MI. 2/25/14

Comments: This is my first pair of Brooks and they seem to fit me extremely well. I used to run in Asics GTs as I'm a mild pronator with a medium arch at 150lbs. These feel less clunky and faster with a much better toe-off. The soles in the forefoot do wear out faster than other shoes though. They provide plenty of cushion but have a longer break in period than others. Looking forward to the 5's when they arrive next year!
From: Matt, San Jose, CA, USA

Comments: I spoke to a Brooks rep in person at a local Fleet Feet opening recently and he said the Ravenna 5 coming in Feb 2014 will go back to the wider toebox as was found in the Ravenna 3.
From: Tom, Montgomery, AL

Comments: I've had every version of the Ravenna. They have always been a great shoe for me, a light weight runner. They fit great without any heel sliding. I must agree with all of the other comments: they seem a little more narrow in the toebox than the previous versions and I've gotten blisters on the lateral aspect of both great toes with runs over 8 miles. I'm thinking about trying the Adrenalines as they boast a wider toebox.
From: Tom, Montgomery, AL

Comments: The Ravenna 4 is a fantastic shoe with a fatal flaw: it's narrow.  I'm currently in the Adrenaline GTS - which is a brilliant shoe - but I wanted a touch less support and a bit more cushioning.  Enter the Ravenna. On paper it was exactly what I was looking for. 

The problem (for me, at least) is that it's a touch narrower than the Adrenaline.  Enough so that they caused blisters on both feet.  Not good. If you need a support shoe and have a foot on the narrow side the Ravenna may be perfect for you.  If you have a medium foot like me, proceed with caution.
From: Dave, California

Comments: I find the top of the shoe (laces) press down too hard on the top of your foot. This lock down is not for me.
From: Martin, NJ, US

Comments: I am on my second pair, soon to be starting on a third. I love these shoes - they are a better fit than the 3s, and provide just a bit of support that I need without giving too much (Adrenalines). I am getting a good 400 miles on a pair before I feel the forefoot cushioning get too compressed - haven't seen any unusual sole wearing out. I would like them a bit wider in the toebox, but they don't cause any rubbing or blistering. I've worn them in a marathon and my feet felt great at the end.
From: Ed, Bethesda, MD

Comments: Sole wears out very fast, also shoe runs narrow.
From: Jonathan, Goldsboro, NC, USA

Comments: Wear this shoe along with my Adrenaline 13's. Love the cushioned fast feel! They fit narrower and have a touch more cushion in the heel and forefoot than the Adrenalines. Run 25-30 miles/wk, have flat feet and I am a mild pronator.
From: Mac, New Orleans, LA



Contribute Your Feedback

Use this form or email to contribute your experiences with this product. Although not necessary, it's interesting to have a first name, city, state and country (no email addresses will be used). Any information submitted becomes the property of Running Warehouse.

Please include any relevant information such as weekly mileage, training or race pace, or foot type.