Comments: Just a warning, ShoeFtr is way off on this shoe. It runs half a size small. I'll post a review after I've got the right size on my foot.
From: Carl, Oakland, CA
Comments: I am loving the MT1010. This last works really well for me [as did the MT20]. And the additional cushioning seems to be just right for longer distances [30+ miles]. However, mine too are ripping at the same place on both shoes after just a handful of runs and about 170 miles. Also, the laces on mine are exceedingly long, even after doing a heel lock and double knot.
From: Liz, Detroit, MI
Comments: I will have to agree with Darren's comments on the durability of the shoe. I personally loved the 1010's. They were, and still are the best trail shoe for me. The cushioning was spot on, traction was great, and the shoe was more than wide enough to accommodate my foot shape and size. Unfortunately, the uppers on both shoes ripped after just a handful of runs. In conversing with other runners that wear this shoe, it seems to be a trend (if the pods are not separating from the rest of the shoe first). I would love to purchase another pair, but I am afraid of the same issues occurring. Until NB sorts out the durability of the uppers, I will have to find something else to run in.
From: Jason, Rochester, NY, USA
Comments: The shoe runs pretty light. It is what it says it is - more of a transition shoe to going minimal so you have a bit of cushion in there. The shoes I had before were the MT101 and the MT1010 got a bit wider and bigger. One thing that really disappointed me since I got it in August when they first came out was that it only took a month or two for the sides to start ripping - I run about 6-7 days a week. Once it started to rip it took a couple more weeks for it to rip into a big hole. Also, during one of my easy 8 mile runs, a stake-like stick was able to puncture through my shoe all the way in until it stabbed the bottom of my foot. I like the MT1010 because of the small amount of cushioning I get while still being a bit minimal, but the thing that would not want me buying another pair is the durability of the shoe. Unfortunately, these shoes only lasted me 4 months.
From: Jansen, San Francisco, CA
Comments: I've run through two pair before writing this review. I like the increase in flexibility as compared to the MT110 but don't like the voluminous upper (admittedly I have a narrow, low volume foot so sizing down does allow for a similar fit when compared to the MT110). Unfortunately, I find the shoes wear much quicker than the MT110. I think the Revlite breaks down a bit quicker versus the ACTEVA midsole within the MT110. My biggest complaint is the outsole design- I really do notice the heavily segmented pod design. For me, I'd prefer something more uniform along the lines of the MT110 or Inov8 TrailRoc series.
From: Darren, Colorado
Comments: The NB MT1010 are the best trail shoes ever made! They are so light they feel like they aren't even there yet they provide ample protection. I ran in my new pair for 5 miles right out of the box and I knew this was a shoe I was going to love. I bought them in 2E width and the toe box room is excellent. Fantastic shoe!
From: Robert, Alpharetta, GA