Customer feedback

Comments: Sadly i was the victim of misinformation about the distance 2012 on your runningwarehouse.com website, where i bought them. You say the shoe has a 4mm drop, despite really loving the shoe (and this should be a lesson to all) i obsessed about them NOT being a zero drop shoe, when in fact they virtually were (2mm is virtually 0mm). so, partly foolishly, partly misguided by the wrong info, i bought first a new balance minimus and then when these proved too harsh on the cement and asphalt i run on, i bought the mv2 off the newton website. Neither of these shoes gave me the cushioning i need on my 5 mile runs on concrete/asphalt, although the newton mv2 did give me a springy bounce the first 35 min of my 65min run, but that faded for the last half of the run and i suffered almost as much pain as with the minimus. Checking out stats on the newton website, i see now my obsession about finding a 0mm drop shoes vs. the 2012 distance was unfounded. The 2mm drop is close enough (though i wish newton would turn it into a true 0mm)...HOWever, the incredible energy return and damping of hard surfaces (naturally, nothing like nike air max or other heel-loaded over-cushioned shoes) is a life saver. i have L4/L5 herniated discs and these shoes allow me to keep running. The choice to go to a true minimalist shoe on very hard surfaces for over an hour was a big mistake for me...though maybe not for you. But i'm guessing for most people, long runs on hard surfaces will not work in a true minimalist shoe, and i'm here to say, the 2013 distance is a comfortable, light, enjoyable and remarkable shoe. Aptly named too.
From: Johnny, Lake Balboa, CA, USA

Comments: I loved the 2011 version of the Newton Distance, super light with plenty of cushioning & really responsive. The 2013 is plenty light, but lacks cushioning which I prefer. If you like a harder feel with responsiveness then this is no doubt a good sneaker. I found the fit in the toe box to be a bit too roomey and I found that this sneaker ran a bit long. I'm 12.5 in the 2011 version and 12 in this one. The 12.5 was way to long. It is my first year running in the Newton's. I like them, they really do get you up on the balls of your feet. The actuator lugs are really not that noticeable after you get used to them. I have not run in the 2012's I heard they had a "harder" feel, less cushioning as well. Bring back the 2011's! Thanks!
From: Mark, Portland, ME, USA

Contribute Your Feedback

Use this form or email feedback@runningwarehouse.com to contribute your experiences with this product. Although not necessary, it's interesting to have a first name, city, state and country (no email addresses will be used). Any information submitted becomes the property of Running Warehouse.

Please include any relevant information such as weekly mileage, training or race pace, or foot type.