
Nike Pegasus Plus Review
Individual Thoughts

The Nike Pegasus Plus did not meet my expectations. The ZoomX foam midsole does not quite deliver the feel I am used to with ZoomX—it is firmer, lacking the signature pop and softness I have experienced in other ZoomX foam midsoles. While the shoe is lightweight and serves well as a lower-stack, ground-connected daily trainer, I found it ideal for shorter runs where picking up the pace is easy. However, my limit with this shoe is about 8 miles; beyond that, the ground contact in the forefoot causes my feet to feel achy.
I am unsure whether the shoe needs more foam underfoot or a revamped version of ZoomX, but it’s missing a protective element. On the bright side, the design is stunning, as are the color options—something Nike has always excelled at. If the price were between $140 and $160, it would be more reasonable.
I had high hopes for this shoe, recalling all my fun, speedy 18+ mile road runs in the Pegasus Turbo 2s, but the Pegasus Plus won’t be my go-to for long road runs. That said, I’m still glad to have it for speed workouts.

The Pegasus Plus immediately catches the eye with its sleek, stylish Flyknit upper that not only looks great but also feels secure and comfortable. I was particularly impressed with how well it holds the midfoot while still providing enough room in the forefoot to support longer runs. Plus, there were no issues with irritation or overheating, which is always a win.
However, the midsole left me feeling a bit underwhelmed. While it is protective and offers a decent bounce, providing a smooth heel-to-toe transition, I expected more responsiveness, especially at this price point. The midsole performs well—do not get me wrong—it works for daily runs and even fast-paced efforts, but it does not stand out from other shoes in its class.
As for the outsole, it does its job with solid grip and traction, but the exposed foam is already showing some wear, which is disappointing. For a shoe in this price range, I would have liked to see full-rubber coverage to enhance durability. The name change and the leftover "Pegasus Turbo" branding on the outsole add a bit of confusion, but this is more of an aesthetic mishap than a functional issue.
All in all, the Pegasus Plus is a solid shoe, but I couldn't help wanting a little more from it. I plan to try the Pegasus 41 to see if the Plus is truly worth the additional cost.
Specifications & Fit
Shoe Specs
Weight | Men's: 8.4 oz (size 9) | Women's: 7.3 oz (size 8) |
Stack Height | 34 mm (Heel), 24 mm (Forefoot) | 10 mm Heel-Toe Offset |
Terrain | Road |
Stability | Neutral |
Sizing | True to size |
Our In-Depth Look
Upper
Grace: "The Pegasus Plus's Flyknit upper has a premium, durable, and breathable feel. The fit is true to size, snug, and highly secure in the heel. The Pegasus also provides an accommodating fit in the toe box. I love the Plus's aesthetic, reminding me of the original Nike Pegasus Turbo and Turbo 2."
Kaleb: "The Pegasus Plus’s Flyknit upper is lightweight and secure, but above all, it has style. Seriously, this shoe is super handsome and other people will notice when you have the Pegasus Plus shoes on your foot. There is a secure hold through the midfoot before opening up to a slightly more spacious forefoot, allowing for toes to splay on longer runs. I also had no problems with overheating, hot spots, or other irritations."
Midsole
Grace: "The midsole was not as soft or cushioned as I expected. I replaced the insoles that originally came with the Nike Pegasus Plus with SUPERfeet insoles, as I am recovering from a posterior tibial tendonitis injury. While testing, I felt the ground quite a bit in the forefoot, and after asking other testers who ran in the shoe, they shared the same underfoot feel.
I owned four pairs of the Nike Turbo 2's, as they were one of my favorite shoes to run in, but the Pegasus Plus did not deliver the same level of underfoot protection for longer distances. I still enjoyed the feel of this shoe for shorter, faster runs up to 8 miles, but the new ZoomX foam midsole did not have the premium, bouncy, protective feel that the Pegasus Turbo was known for. I wish the rocker geometry was just slightly more prominent as well."
Kaleb: "I have to preface this by saying that I never had the opportunity to test the Pegasus Turbo. That said, I have accumulated my fair share of Pegasus miles. I have also heard nothing but good things about the newly revamped Pegasus 4, but back to the shoe at hand.
I was not overly impressed with the ride or responsiveness during my first couple of test runs. The shoe felt protective, bouncy, and secure, but the Pegasus Plus did not necessarily distinguish itself from the competition. I just wanted a bigger 'PLUS,' especially given the price. Again, I want to emphasize that the overall experience in the Pegasus Plus was good, and I would have no issue reaching for it for daily runs and even some faster tempo efforts, but I was expecting more given the price."
Outsole
Grace: "The Plus's outsole is simple, featuring Nike’s signature waffle pattern. The center section of the midsole is exposed, which led to some minor aesthetic wear, but it wasn't an issue for me. The waffle pattern provided plenty of traction and durability on paved roads, gravel paths, and even fire roads."
Kaleb: "The name change has already sparked some spirited debate among our testers, but the thing I do not understand is why the outsole still says 'Pegasus Turbo.' If nothing else, it just adds to the confusion.
That aside, the high-abrasion rubber outsole performed well throughout testing. The grip was dependable, and I had no issues with traction, regardless of surface or weather conditions. However, there is a large area of exposed foam, which has taken some abuse, showing signs of wear and tear and raising concerns about long-term durability. Given the price point, I would have preferred full-rubber coverage to help extend the shoe's lifespan."
Comparable Models
Nike Pegasus Plus vs. Nike Pegasus 41
Grace: "The new Nike Pegasus 41 has a more premium feel, especially for higher mileage, thanks to the added protection from the higher stack and more pronounced rocker geometry. Although I enjoyed running in both shoes, it’s hard to overlook the fact that the Nike Pegasus Plus is priced $40 higher than the Nike Pegasus 41."
Pegasus Plus vs. Brooks Launch
Grace: "I have not run in a Brooks Launch in a long time, but while testing the Pegasus Plus, the underfoot experience kept reminding me of it. The specs of both shoes are very similar, with 10mm drops, identical stack heights, and similar weights. I tend to lean towards more cushioned shoes, so the ground feels in the forefoot was the main aspect that linked these two shoes in my mind."
Pegasus Plus vs. adidas Ultraboost 5X
Kaleb: "Like the Pegasus line, the adidas Ultraboost line is known for its comfortable, bouncy midsole. Both the Plus and the 5X offer a ride suitable for daily training, though the Ultraboost feels slightly heavier, with a more premium and responsive Boost foam midsole. Both shoes straddle the line between performance daily trainers and lifestyle athleisure shoes, with signature styles that attract many fans. The Pegasus Plus wins my vote in the looks department. If you prefer a more natural, connected-to-the-ground ride, go with the Plus. If you want more protection, I would recommend the Ultraboost. And if you want unbeatable all-day style, you can’t go wrong with either model."