Running Shoe Reviews
Altra Experience Wild 2
adidas Terrex Agravic TT Review
Published: March 4, 2026
Specifications & Fit
Shoe Specs
| Weight | Men's: 10.8 oz (size 9) | Women's: 9.6 oz (size 8) |
| Stack Height | 38 mm (Heel), 30 mm (Forefoot) | 8 mm Heel-Toe Offset |
| Terrain | Trail |
| Stability | Neutral |
| Sizing | True to Size |
Our In-Depth Look
The adidas Terrex Agravic TT is for you if...
You’re a technical trail runner wanting to go further and faster.
You want protection for more challenging, mountainous terrain.
You like a small dose of bounce atop an otherwise sturdy platform.
What is the adidas Terrex Agravic TT made for?
It started with the adidas Terrex Agravic Speed Ultra, a groundbreaking pinnacle trail racing shoe built for performance and speed. After the debut model proved itself as a fast, nimble, adaptable choice for ultramarathon distances, the next iteration of the Speed Ultra 2 brought more of what we loved with enhanced features for comfort and stability. Great traction, protective underfoot comfort, and a speedy, energetic ride—what more could you possibly need?
Now introducing: the adidas Terrex Agravic TT. If you’ve been craving a trail shoe like the Speed Ultra 2, but want a little more stability and aggression for even tougher terrain, then pay attention to this one.
The Terrex Agravic TT is still designed to be a fast and dynamic race-day shoe, like its preceding sibling, but it has been dialed in for really technical, rocky trails. The lugs have been lengthened to 4.5mm with a focus on multidirectional traction and stability. Soft, energetic Lightstrike Pro foam is cradled in a layer of durable Lightstrike 3.0 for added protection when trails get tough. The composite rock plate is segmented in a finger-like structure, offering flexible energy return while keeping you protected from rocks. Finishing off with an abrasion-resistant upper, secure heel construction, and sawtooth laces, this shoe is race-ready for the grittiest trails.
In practice, this shoe delivers everything promised. However, our preferences were divided when it came to the comfort and weight of the shoe. Here's how it went down.
Comfort
For the most part, this shoe was comfortably protective and stable out on the trails. The upper is more durable than the Speed Ultra 2, which improved stability and gave us a more comfortable ride. We didn't question the shoes' ability to keep us upright, which let us focus instead on enjoying the adventure of our runs. The tongue is thin, but the notched laces are plenty comfortable. The padding on the heel collar was unanimously approved and added a nice touch of comfort.
The underfoot feel is on the firmer side, which protected us against any sharp pokes. For one of our testers, this firmer foam arrangement left them wishing for a bit more plushness for increased shock absorption. However, we all agreed that the overall ride is steady as a result. If you tend to prefer a squishier foam, this is something to keep in mind.
Performance
This is a shoe that was made for technical terrain, and it delivers. It works well on groomed trails and muddy fire roads alike, and it gripped and ripped across both rocky and rough stretches. The longer lugs made us feel secure and confident while crossing sketchier parts of trails, and the shoe has a wider platform which contributes to a more stable ride. The rocker geometry is less aggressive than that of the Speed Ultra 2, but for a shoe built for more technical trails and potentially longer distances, this feels appropriate.
One performance aspect that could use more work is the overall weight. We know that a more built-up outsole is a trade-off for an increased net weight, and we definitely appreciate how aggressive the outsole is. That said, we still found ourselves wishing that the shoe was a touch lighter.
Fit
We found these shoes to fit true to size, and they worked well for a variety of foot types. The upper feels secure and stable on the trails, and the nonslip sawtooth laces are a welcome bonus. We all agreed that there is plenty of room in the midfoot, and we enjoyed secure fits in the heel without it feeling too narrow. Compared to the Speed Ultra 2, the upper has more room in the midfoot and forefoot, which will please those who found the Speed Ultra 2 to feel tight and narrow.
Most of us experienced no issues with hotspots or areas of discomfort, while one of us found the toe geometry to feel more tapered than their liking. For some people, the shoe may pinch down around the pinky toe area too much, but this will come down to personal fit preference and user experience.
Individual Thoughts
KaitlynOverall Score: 9.5/10
Overall, this shoe is practically a perfect shoe in my eyes for any trail runner that favors more technical or rugged trails. It exceeded my expectations for comfort and stability. I felt secure whether power hiking uphill or picking up pace on flatter sections, making it perfect for both technical trail running and hiking.
The underfoot feeling is comfortable over long distances and a variety of terrain. The only reason I knocked it down half a point is due to the shoe being ever so slightly tight in the toe box and around the instep. While neither of these would deter me away from using the shoe, it does knock it down from being a perfect shoe for me.
LoucasOverall Score: 7/10
It kind of pains me to rate this shoe so low. This low ranking is largely a function of my previously established, perhaps unreasonable, sky-high levels of stoke. I truly do appreciate the thoughtfulness and the attempt. This just falls short for me, largely because of the weight and the relative lack of bounce. Adidas could make this exact same shoe with more room at the toe tips, and full Lightstrike Pro (like the Agravic Speed Ultra), and I’d change my tune dramatically. They could even take out the rock plate--maybe even some strategic cutouts of the rubber base layer between the lugs. But what we got here didn't match my hopes.
To be fair, the TT accomplishes the “steady and burly for technical terrain” part of what they set out to accomplish. But its firmness, lack of bounce, weight, and toe fit all pulled it down my ranks pretty dramatically. On a positive note, it’s naturally trustworthy right out of the box, protective, and it has at least a hint of that Lightstrike Pro feeling up top.
ErikOverall Score: 9/10
When we are talking about the all-new Agravic TT, we need to look to the Agravic Speed Ultra and the Agravic Speed Ultra 2 as great companions and points of comparison. When it came out, many loved the Speed Ultra and regarded it as the fastest trail racing shoe on the market. But people found the terrain it could handle to be limited (non-technical), and for many, the distance to be limited as well. The aggressive nature of the shoe made it a somewhat tough choice for everyone wanting to travel ultra-distances during their races.
The Agravic TT was developed for athletes who want the performance enhancement of the Speed Ultra, but who need something a little more stable and forgiving. This is the rocky terrain big brother to the speedy Agravic Speed Ultra 2. The geometries and underfoot setup of this shoe, coupled with a substantial upper, created a new entry in the trail racing category that can handle a wider variety of terrain, including the more technical elements found with many trail races.
The combined rock/speed plate provides improved energy return while maintaining a good amount of stability and protection underfoot. The combination of the Lightstrike pro foam (responsive) and the Lightstrike 3.0 foam (stability) further enhances the racing and technical aspects of this shoe.
The one potential drawback for some is the weight of this shoe. To be the top-level racing shoe for a wider variety of people, future versions need to drop some weight. Even taking away half an ounce will put this shoe into a better position in the market.
